Tuesday's U.S. appeals court Tuesday ruling that found the Federal Communications Commission overstepped its authority when it cited Comcast Corp. for slowing some Internet traffic on its network, has brought the Net Neutrality debate back and louder than ever.
In a unanimous decision, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said the FCC exceeded its authority when it sanctioned Comcast in 2008 for deliberately preventing some subscribers from using peer-to-peer file-sharing services to download large files.
But, more and more it appears that Tuesday's ruling is not a knockout victory for Internet Service Providers (ISPs), nor a death knell for Net Neutrality and its most vocal supporters, which include Google, Twitter and Amazon.
As with everything in DC, there is no black or white, just grey, with a tinge of green. Tuesday's decision puts in motion the next phase of regulatory jockeying with the focus zeroing in on the next move the FCC will make.
A 463 legal source says the decision did not determine that the FCC cannot impose Net Neutrality rules. It only found that the FCC's theory for why it has "ancillary" authority to adopt these rules was deficient.
So, the real question of the day is: Will the FCC reclassify broadband service as a telecommunications service, giving it full authority to impose Net Neutrality rules?
The plot thickens...
Thank you for keeping us up to date in this issue.
Posted by: Resveratrol Healthblog | April 09, 2010 at 03:22 PM
Man this stuff makes me so angry. We are on the edge of an amazing technological future that is made possible by true freedom and flow of information but yet again the blindness of the entrenched old system capital will not let the world progress. This isn't just backward thinking its actually anti entrepreneurial.
Posted by: Techno Music | May 10, 2010 at 03:13 AM
It's so nice to have you do all of the research for us. It makes our decision making so much easier!! Thanks.
Posted by: MBT Shoes | July 15, 2011 at 01:22 AM
I read a lot of reviews of the expo disc and deidced to give it a try. It is so easy to use and the results are sooooo much better than auto white balance. Like anything else in this world, it is only a tool; it doesn't do miracles. But, when it is used correctly, it helps make your photos look fantastic. Initially, I hated having to pay $100 dollars for it. I thought, What a rip-off for such a little lens But, after I saw the results I quickly realized how valuable it is to me. Once you get accurate colors, you'll never want to go back to auto and presets again!!! Imagine being able to shoot jpgs that have correct color. I hate shooting Raw because the file sizes are huge and there is always the extra step of converting them to a format that anyone can view. When I use the expo disc I can get the color right the first time and not have to sit in front of a computer tweaking the color of thousands of photos! Even if you like to shoot Raw, it still saves you time because you won't have to edit the white balance on every photo taken indoors.This is a lot more convenient than using a gray card and it is more accurate.
Posted by: Bill | February 16, 2013 at 01:12 AM
Hey Denise,Hope all is well. We went through the SFU IAT parorgm together. I just found your blog. Interesting idea! Stick people! Very cool.
Posted by: Grigory | February 16, 2013 at 03:30 AM
cat is officially out of the bag for the Motorola XOOM WiFi edtioin. We knew that sooner or later Motorola would bring this state-side, especially knowing that people haven't been too pleased to pay $800 for a tablet. Well now
Posted by: Guzalia | February 16, 2013 at 04:07 AM
clP6qf ioezbhsspssw
Posted by: swnizwe | February 17, 2013 at 03:15 AM
M90kOC , [url=http://olnrecprpndc.com/]olnrecprpndc[/url], [link=http://yqgpurntyduy.com/]yqgpurntyduy[/link], http://fwuyaaqshnzn.com/
Posted by: djyiyfctkl | February 17, 2013 at 11:51 AM
O34fKO , [url=http://iwcekbkskwka.com/]iwcekbkskwka[/url], [link=http://andutzoapuve.com/]andutzoapuve[/link], http://ehriaiuoprai.com/
Posted by: sjgwvviqgw | February 17, 2013 at 11:57 AM
lDXZ75 fluetubkomjn
Posted by: hvudbdjjfvd | February 18, 2013 at 08:15 PM
UMadmD , [url=http://wakrsswykhnf.com/]wakrsswykhnf[/url], [link=http://wbrzyijbjmtx.com/]wbrzyijbjmtx[/link], http://fqtgfxyaxhbl.com/
Posted by: akeghcaa | February 19, 2013 at 01:55 AM