Katie Hallen -- If there ever was a more hated word in the political etymology of 2009, it was "bailout." An unfortunate word choice from the start, the Obama administration used it to describe its loan program with the banks, and then it quickly morphed into catch-all phrase to sum up the problems of corporate excess in the face of unbridled government spending.
Everybody hated the bailout, it would seem. President Obama told us in his first State of the Union last week hatred for the bailout was the "one thing" that united the Democrats and Republicans. "I hated it. You hated it. It was about as popular as a root canal," Obama said.
Meanwhile, behind the scenes and largely out of the media glow, economists were hashing out at academic conferences - and increasingly on the blogosphere and YouTube - the merits of the administration's fiscal mascot, the man behind the bailout's reasoning, as it were: John Maynard Keynes.
Challenging Keynes, the economist who helped us understand the cause and solutions to the Great Depression, is a pretty radical move. A long line of presidents and plenty of modern economists have worshiped Keynesian theory and turned to it to justify government stepping in to help manage market downturns, invest in public works, stimulus programs and hire the unemployed.
But George Mason University economist Russ Roberts, it seems, thought old-man Keynes was getting a little too influential in the new administration - and even more critically, worried that the politics of the "bailout" were diluting what could be a powerful economic discussion. In response, he and producer John Papola launched an educational video to give attention to a lesser-known Keynes peer: F.A. Hayek. Hayek, a staunch advocate of free markets, famously warned against the boom-and-bust cycle that could be spurred by inappropriate government initiatives like artificially low interest rates.
"Fear the Boom and Bust" rap debuted a couple of weeks ago, and it's already climbed to 480,000 views on YouTube. Rivals Keynes and Hayek, in comedy troupe fashion, argue their differences during a night of partying in New York before an economic conference - or shall we say it's Keynes who partakes in the bulk of the debauchery (symbolic comedy, of course).
Check out the video. Who knew a funny video might make the hated "bailout" worth debating again?
We all hated the bailout.
Posted by: order resveratrol | June 22, 2010 at 02:19 PM
Important inflection points in the market growth rate sometimes can be predicted by constructing a product diffusion curve. The shape of the curve can be estimated by studying the characteristics of the adoption rate of a similar product in the past.the average profit potential for a market can be used as a guideline for knowing how difficult it is to make money in the market. Michael Porter devised a useful framework for evaluating the attractiveness of an industry or market. Changes in the market are important because they often are the source of new opportunities and threats. The relevant trends are industry-dependent, but some examples include changes in price sensitivity, demand for variety, and level of emphasis on service and support.
Posted by: Stock Market | August 05, 2010 at 11:14 PM
After read the article.I have just one word to say,you are so brilliant.I like all of your article.Well done.
http://www.asicsstore.org/
http://www.guccisale.us
http://www.okeyshoptrade.com/
Posted by: Franklin and Marshall | May 30, 2011 at 12:53 AM
It's so nice to have you do all of the research for us. It makes our decision making so much easier!! Thanks.
Posted by: MBT Shoes | July 15, 2011 at 01:23 AM
“What would you like?” the person at the counter asks me.
Posted by: Asics Onitsuka Tiger | February 20, 2012 at 12:07 AM
Your essay is good, I like it very much. Here I would like to share with you
Posted by: ilahi dinle | May 04, 2012 at 04:49 AM
Bob Mack I expect you will find Econ Stories isinreettng.T2T I expect at least the next couple years will be freaky and random. There is so much nonsense coming out of the Obama Administration there is no way to keep up with it. In addition, even if we win big in the next election, Democrats will still run many big institution. So we have to watch out for the big stuff, stuff that will be hard to undo once we throw out the Democrats.The Judicial Watch “senior staff” children is simply ludicrous. Michelle enjoys passing herself off as senior diplomat and spending our money. Surprise! Surprise! Did she accomplish anything useful? We can hope. However, if all she did is waste some of our money, it is a relatively small sum. On the other hand, another $447 billion dollar bill with who know what laws in it that we cannot afford. That we must fight. We must keep the main battles front and center. We must focus on elections. Unless we win 60 votes in the Senate, the presidency, and retain Congress, we may not be able to undo all the damage Obama and the Democrats have done. We may not succeed in reversing their agenda.
Posted by: Dlanyer | May 29, 2012 at 05:49 AM
I feel so much smarter after wiathcng that.Also, you can't tab through the fields (from name to email to URL) in the comment box (you can from the comment box to the submit comment button) which I don't like.
Posted by: Sent | May 31, 2012 at 12:31 AM
It was about as popular as a root canal," Obama said.
Posted by: Elaina Forte | June 14, 2012 at 12:24 AM
I hated it. You hated it. It was about as popular as a root canal," Obama said.
Posted by: Anh Mulligan | June 16, 2012 at 03:11 AM
Besides being an economist (not frianokomecs, not undercover, simply economics ), Regina Ip is also a mobilizer (for hate on her), a (failed) campiagner, an organizer of an alumni association (sorry a think tank )and most important of all, a historian . See this: 對於全國人大常委會委員長吳邦國早前在基本法座談會上提出「剩餘權力」的問題,,葉劉淑儀認為只是提醒大家中國的國情,不像美國、加拿大般行聯邦制,各州省有「剩餘權力」,「中國立國以來……自秦始皇以來,地區便沒有剩餘權力,都是中央授權的……香港人發展民主要面對的現實,不能當自己是獨立國家。」(Source: 文匯報 , 17 June 2007, p. A15)Maybe she and Ma Lik can both chaired as the professors of a history department in universities!
Posted by: Ahmed | August 05, 2012 at 09:54 PM
Pay for an appraisal. It will tell you what the marekt is dictating for your specific property. Real estate agencies use a similar product called a BPO (Broker Price Opinion) which is a limited less detailed appraisal of the property.This is truly the best way to sell your home without an agent. An agent is important in marekting your home and its price. So if you're going to take this on you need an accurate picture of the marekt your facing, most importantly since you are located in one of the worst real estate marekts in the country.A certified residential appraiser would be best for your needs. In my area I charge $350 for a single family home under 3000 square feet. This doesn't mean you shouldn't pay more, more experience and education will demand a higher fee. Do not hire an appraiser who's fees are based on your homes value. You want an ethical appraiser with a good reputation to give you a realistic value. Even if its not what you want to see, it would be in your best interest to have an objective view of the home and its immediate localeThis appraisal is also a powerful negotiating tool when it comes time to sign a contract. Find a title agency, you'll need one to sell your house, they can also provide you with a proper contract and deed assistance.[]
Posted by: Yanita | August 05, 2012 at 10:06 PM
it to describe its loan program with the banks, and then it quickly morphed into catch-all.
Posted by: Ayana Bertrand | August 08, 2012 at 12:06 AM
I wonder how you got so good. This is really a fascinating blog, lots of stuff that I can Get into. One thing I just want to say is that your Blog is so perfect!
Posted by: isabel marant outlet | August 10, 2012 at 12:13 AM
Vaikka olisin parempi jos meni vähän tarkemmin, olen silti saanut ydin mitä tarkoitit. Olen samaa mieltä. Se ei ehkä ole suosittu ajatus, mutta se on järkevää. Varmasti tulla takaisin enemmän tätä. Suuri work.Good työ, ihana blogi ... todella nauttia siitä ja lisätään se minun sosiaaliset kirjanmerkit. Jatkakaa hyvää työtä
Posted by: converse all star | October 26, 2012 at 02:16 AM
Kiitos, että luotettava yritys antaa selitys. Tunnen hyvin vahva noin se ja haluavat saada tietoa enemmän. Jos se on OK, kun saavuttaa ylimääräistä intensiivinen viisautta, voisitko ajatuksia lisäämällä ylimääräisiä viestiä hyvin samanlainen kuin tämä yksi enemmän tietoa? Se voisi olla erittäin hyödyllistä ja hyödyllinen minulle ja kollegoilleni.
Posted by: chaussures converse one star | October 26, 2012 at 02:16 AM
I'm also commenting to make you know what a exceptional experience my friend's girl had checking yuor web blog. She realized too many things, including what it's like to have a wonderful teaching spirit to make a number of people really easily completely grasp specific specialized issues. You really exceeded her desires. Thank you for offering the priceless, safe, informative and even fun tips about your topic to Jane.
Posted by: canada goose norge | October 30, 2012 at 09:01 AM