Sure, it was a lot to pack into a single speech.
Yesterday, President Obama covered everything from the Swine Flu to math tests in a speech to the National Academy of Sciences about his administration's innovation policy. But, there was some very specific significant news that came out of it.
Hint: This wasn't it...
"Google’s CEO Gets an Official Seat at President Obama’s Table" (Mashable)
or this:
"Google’s Schmidt and Microsoft’s Mundie Appointed As Obama Tech Advisors" (TechCrunch)
Or many of the similar stories about the PCAST appointments.
Give up?
It was this, from the Financial Times:
Barack Obama on Monday promised to double public funding of scientific research to exceed the level Washington spent during the “space race” unleashed by Dwight Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy 50 years ago.
The US president’s pledge, made in a speech at the National Academy of Sciences in Washington, included a promise to take ideology out of public research following what many scientists saw as the politicisation of science under George W. Bush – particularly in the field of climate change.
Under Mr Obama’s pledge, the US would increase to 3 per cent the proportion of gross domestic product it spends on scientific research and development – roughly the same level as under Kennedy.
Information Week further explains:
Obama in his budget has proposed doubling the budgets for the National Science Foundation, the Department of Energy's Office of Science, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
He also introduced a new arm of the Department of Energy, the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Energy, designed to replicate the research success of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.
In addition, he said he planned to triple the number of NSF graduate research fellowships.
Good for the FT and Information Week, but unfortunate that the Schmidt PCAST appointment, in particular, stepped on what should have been the headline of most of the coverage yesterday. Instead, we got analysis of Google's relationship with the Obama administration and paragraphs like this:
The role doesn't give Schmidt any decision making powers on the federal level. But it does place him in a seat of influence, potentially on issues that impact Google like network neutrality, privacy and copyright.
Actually, yes, no and no. Because, if this were the case, this fellow PCAST member would soon be deep in shaping the future of Internet policy...
Barbara Schaal is Professor of Biology at Washington University in St Louis. She is a renowned plant geneticist who has used molecular genetics to understand the evolution and ecology of plants, ranging from the US Midwest to the tropics.
The usually smart All Things D blog chimes in with: "(The Schmidt appointment) is one more indication–and the biggest one yet–that Google has become firmly part of the Washington establishment."
Not really and absolutely not.
You see, PCAST is a well-respected body that has been employed by most presidents in the last fifty years or so. But, it is, to its core, a top-notch blue-ribbon panel made up of academics, researchers and select industry folk. Check out what the PCAST team in the Bush White House developed here. And, here is a link to the Clinton PCAST page.
Saying that this is the cherry on top of Google becoming part of the "Washington establishment" is paramount to saying that the "Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences at Harvard University now has the same access to the Obamas as the first puppy." (Daniel Schrag, the Sturgis Hooper Professor of Geology in said department is also a member)
Even with an exponential increase in prioritization from the Obama Administration, PCAST will remain a helpful body that focuses on big picture research issues and ensuring that the country remains competitive by providing balance of innovation incentives and tools for learning. But, it will not be deciding the future of net neutrality.
Carnival of Everything Finance #8 @ Stock Trading To Go. My article, Slash Your Winter Heating Bills - 10 Inexpensive Ways to Save Big This Winter was iclduned. addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fcashmoneylife.com%2F2007%2F12%2F08%2Fweekly-roundup-financial-goals-edition%2F'; addthis_title = 'Weekly+Roundup+-+Financial+Goals+Edition'; addthis_pub = '';
Posted by: Jocelyn | August 07, 2012 at 04:42 PM
Y'all keep me on my toes!! I meant to say that any sewing paerttn will work -- maybe an old halloween one you don't need anymore?? Or I find them at thrift stores here. I have been selling them in my etsy shop also. :) Happy hunting!!
Posted by: Karthick | August 07, 2012 at 04:54 PM
http://www.viagraprescription.me.uk/#do-get-prescription-viagra viagra by prescription in ontarioviagra buy no prescription canada
Posted by: NugReenuefs | November 14, 2012 at 12:06 AM
Hello. And Bye.
Posted by: XRumerTest | February 03, 2013 at 10:04 PM
Good covered point, lots of peolpe simply put something weired theories in front of public.But it doesn't work i think because know one sure how it will going to happenIt looks like just coping ideas which someone has already written. I found even onpopular blogs guest bloggers bring same theories which I already know. I observed theyjust try to spice up their article without knowing what really audience want to read.
Posted by: Etik | February 13, 2013 at 11:41 AM
Thanks, Hank. I completely agree with your aessssment. I, too, welcome the use of innovation and technologies that, as you say, would enable a more precise understanding of the data, so that it is more readily interpretable by EHR technologies and user-practitioners. And that access to data could become more straightforward, regardless of the technology of the source. But, too often the context of the patient is not fully considered in these discussions, and my intent was to raise that voice more loudly. I also agree with your concerns about taking too disruptive of an approach. The sweet spot would be to build on the foundational standards work that has been accomplished and find a way to simplify and accelerate its adoption. Those providers that testified at the HIT Standards Committee implementation hearings last week were calling for interoperability NOW. We don't have time to start the process over again.
Posted by: Elina | February 13, 2013 at 08:54 PM
EQxzTh , [url=http://kzbuxeerphtn.com/]kzbuxeerphtn[/url], [link=http://lmnalhwteghk.com/]lmnalhwteghk[/link], http://leskzigzjtio.com/
Posted by: emhdipunsv | February 15, 2013 at 11:34 PM
EQxzTh , [url=http://kzbuxeerphtn.com/]kzbuxeerphtn[/url], [link=http://lmnalhwteghk.com/]lmnalhwteghk[/link], http://leskzigzjtio.com/
Posted by: emhdipunsv | February 15, 2013 at 11:35 PM
If your articles are alywas this helpful, "I'll be back."
Posted by: Sayap | February 15, 2013 at 11:53 PM
Whoa, whoa, get out the way with that good infomratoin.
Posted by: Sri | February 16, 2013 at 02:15 AM
Well said Bill & it's great there are people out there like you that can show cltines the opportunities for them to integrate best of breed thro an API environment most cltines think technology is the hard bit it isn't and shouldn't be although I know people who make money from telling people it's hard .
Posted by: Ahmed | February 16, 2013 at 03:17 AM
Mona, these are just beautiful! I eslpaicely love the little footbridge. Such a wonderful composition. We got just a little snow last night, so hopefully things will be a little more "colorful" here now.Thank you so much for sharing with us this week at The Creative Exchange.Have a fantastic day!lisa.
Posted by: Bngfn | February 16, 2013 at 03:27 AM
Thanks for your advice on this blog. 1 thing I would wish to say is puicahsrng electronics items from the Internet is certainly not new. In truth, in the past 10 years alone, the marketplace for online electronic products has grown noticeably. Today, you will discover practically any kind of electronic gizmo and other gadgets on the Internet, ranging from cameras and camcorders to computer elements and game playing consoles.
Posted by: Nchris | February 16, 2013 at 05:15 AM
You lost me, buddy. I mean, I suppose I get what youre denclriag. I understand what you are saying, but you just appear to have forgotten about that you'll find some other people within the world who view this matter for what it really is and may well not agree with you. You may be turning away a decent amount of people who may have been fans of your web site.
Posted by: Sergey | February 16, 2013 at 05:29 AM
shoe lifts really are a great purchase, low price shoe lifts that provide total manage and elevated confidentiality
http://ilossweight.com/index.php?do=/profile-5491/info/
Posted by: DerneLare | February 16, 2013 at 07:41 AM
GQz3yn iixpvdtpfrht
Posted by: uacygqqpfh | February 17, 2013 at 03:36 AM
qJmSIU , [url=http://ckuqotscznrs.com/]ckuqotscznrs[/url], [link=http://mtgnfknhaudi.com/]mtgnfknhaudi[/link], http://innlvpncyuob.com/
Posted by: hszcesxm | February 17, 2013 at 10:40 AM
95xOy5 hmhqgbanskhj
Posted by: dcuwrxvqt | February 18, 2013 at 09:10 PM