Mike Masnick says it best today:
There have been some folks in the press who have repeatedly pointed out Google CEO Eric Schmidt's close relationship with President Obama to suggest that Google should be "protected" from government regulation. However, there's little to suggest that's necessarily the case. Plenty of folks who feel strongly anti-Google have close relationships with the administration as well. And, as Bloomberg notes, Obama's nominee for antitrust chief, Christine Varney, has recently described Google as a likely antitrust problem, noting the company "has acquired a monopoly in Internet online advertising." Of course, that's wrong on many levels (it doesn't have anything close to a monopoly in online ads), but this should at least serve as evidence that reports of Google's "control" over the administration isn't nearly as strong as some have been suggesting.
Very interesting information!Perfect just what I was looking for!
http://shanhupu.noahblog.com/
http://pushu.blogdetik.com/
http://wuhuaguo.postbit.com/
http://ziye58.bcz.com/
Posted by: sftthf | July 28, 2012 at 12:53 AM