New York Governor David Paterson's proposed state budget "hits New Yorkers in their iPods - and nickels-and-dimes them in lots of other places, too" says the New York Daily News.
Trying to close a $15.4 billion budget gap, Paterson called for 88 new fees and a host of other taxes, including an "iPod tax" that taxes the sale of downloaded music and other "digitally delivered entertainment services."
While we sympathize with the tough road ahead that the governor faces in trying to balance a budget in the teeth of a generation's worst recession, there are so many things wrong with the download tax.
First, as Mike Masnick points out, there is no functional reason for this...
...other than the fact that the state desperately needs money, and so it's trying to add taxes to just about anything it can find. Of course, back in the old days, the point of a sales tax like that was to contribute to gov't-funded infrastructure (roads and such) that allowed folks to go and buy something. There's no such rationale for taxing internet downloads. It's a blatant money grab and Paterson seems to have no problem admitting that.
Internet issue advocacy group NetChoice weighs in on how, in an era where tax policy should be encouraging energy efficiency and carbon impact, this tax does the opposite:
...why in the world would NY impose a new tax on something we all want to encourage right now? Digital downloads of music, movies, and books have no carbon footprint and use none of the oil consumed with a round-trip to the store. Moreover, there’s no plastic and paper packaging to create and crate off to a landfill. We've blogged on the environmental benefits of downloading here.
NetChoice also raises an issue that most other coverage has ignored to date: Namely, "the budget proposes expanding and asserting the concept of "nexus" to cover out-of-state sellers that use an online network of affiliates."
This will:
"also extend the long hand of government to the long tail of online commerce. Who'll be hurt? Small, independent artists that have websites to sell their own creative works. If a NY-based author or musician adds a link to her webpage saying ‘buy my book/music now on Amazon.com’, she’d be creating a new tax collection burden for Amazon--on everything Amazon sells to anyone in NY State. Amazon’s not going to sit still for that, and they might just stop their affiliate program for NY-based suppliers, authors, and musicians. "
So, let's say that your emerging band isn't AC/DC and you can't get an exclusive deal with Wal-Mart to sell your music. You go directly to your fans on the Web and hope that they choose to pay for your music instead of pirating it. This tax would both create an additional cost that will never get into the hands of the struggling artist, and it might minimize the breadth of online channels that NY artists have to sell their work on the Internet.
Digital downloads of music, movies, and books have no carbon footprint and use none of the oil consumed with a round-trip to the store. Moreover, there’s no plastic and paper packaging to create and crate off to a landfill. We've blogged on the environmental benefits of downloading here.
Posted by: Lisa Marie | December 22, 2008 at 08:56 AM
the daily news is bad for pocketbook , the environment of dropshipping wholesalers at ebat http://www.dropshipdaemon.com | Wholesale Dropship
Posted by: Wholesale Dropship | April 26, 2010 at 04:52 PM
Good post,This was exactly what I needed to read today! I am sure this has relevance to many of us out there.[url=http://www.fashioniphone.com/iphone-cases]iPhone Cases[/url]
Posted by: iPhone Cases | October 26, 2010 at 06:20 PM
You can also try Google shopping or eBay. There are a lot of different cases to choose from so if you have some idea of what you want (hard case, gel case etc) it will make it easier to search.
Posted by: R4i 3D | March 30, 2011 at 11:16 PM
It was NOT a contrail. I worked in the airline industry -- please, it's not a contrail. I think they said that because they know what it is and they are trying to throw us off.
Posted by: coach purses | May 03, 2011 at 04:34 AM
I assume you bought a repossessed home that had the yard neglected. First make sure your sprinkler system works if not get it repaired and start watering the lawn. Once you do you may start to see some green grass emerge. Mow the lawn then get rid of the worst weeds.
Posted by: shearling boots | May 05, 2011 at 04:50 AM
The NAACP must have had a rally in your town and made them all realize that doing crime is not their fault. If you come from under privilaged areas then obviously you have a free ticket and excuse to do whatever crimes you want.
Posted by: porsche carrera sunglasses | May 24, 2011 at 12:38 AM
Where is a better place for aspiring musicians to get their works out? I'm trying to make a successful life with music... exposure seems to be what I need.
Posted by: prom dresses under 100 | May 25, 2011 at 02:34 AM
All items that are free and not scarce would be given for use with with full freedom . Scarce Resources cannot be doled out free - You have full freedom to be hungry.
Posted by: abstract art | May 26, 2011 at 03:21 AM
Thank you, you always get to all new and used it
Posted by: bar stools | June 16, 2011 at 05:30 PM
I am so glad you never put the winner on the front page anymore since that one time when I freaked out b/c the west coast didn't know that shut your mouth and say it ain't so won yet.
Posted by: bar chairs | June 16, 2011 at 05:31 PM
As for the content, I am not a control freak. I do not wear Birkenstocks. I do not tsk-tsk either. I have become fatigued with people accusing me of "hand wringing." Hand wringing seems to be the de rigueur put-down of the day to the point that it has become a cliche.
Posted by: bar table | June 16, 2011 at 05:32 PM
I am glad I read this, because it reminded me too of the fears of Kruschev's "We will ury you!" burned into my psyche. Tho I still doubt that I would have reacted like these ids...
Posted by: leather sofa | June 16, 2011 at 05:33 PM
I think you will actually find quite a few adults (even baby boomers) who were celebratory as well. It seems that you are dismissing this a youth/college-student phenomenon, when really it just wasn't. I am not of those who were thoroughly disgusted with the celebration.
Posted by: floor jack | June 16, 2011 at 05:34 PM
I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often
Posted by: free shipping Wedding Supplies | July 13, 2011 at 05:49 PM
It's so nice to have you do all of the research for us. It makes our decision making so much easier!! Thanks.
Posted by: MBT Shoes | July 15, 2011 at 01:36 AM
Welcome To Official Supra Footwear Online Shop!（http://www.suprafootwear.us）
http://www.suprafootwear.us
Posted by: Account Deleted | November 14, 2011 at 09:46 PM
No. It has to be a registered 501(c)(3) cirthay. If you gave more than $250 to any single cirthay, they must give you a receipt. Receipts required for all cash donations no matter how small. Retain receipts for your records for 6 years in case you get audited.References :
Posted by: nazario | May 29, 2012 at 09:04 AM
The IRS would only be going after you if distribution of the atesss was made without the tax debt being paid by the estate. The executor of the estate shouldn't have given any atesss without a release from the IRS. You may have a case against the executor for breach of fiduciary duty but you'll still have to pay the taxes owed. The IRS does offer Installment Agreements on tax debt for people in situations like yours. Definitely look into a penalty abatement to try to cut that down because in this may not be your fault.
Posted by: SaHrom | May 30, 2012 at 07:20 PM
Honestly, the only real benefit for first time home buryes right now is that they do not have a house to sell and can take advantage of the low housing prices. There are some first time home buyer government grants out there but they are few and far between.The other benefit is the tax credit that you mentioned. Right now, the law in effect is for a tax credit up to $7,500. The 15,000 tax credit bill has not passed yet (and there is no guarantee that any bill will pass). No, it does not mean that you receive 7,500 toward the down payment and no, it does not mean that you are taxed on 7,500 less income. What it means is that if purchase a house by June of 2009, when you file your 2009 taxes you can opt to receive an additional $7,500 on your refund. That $7,500 is really an interest free loan that is repaid over the next 15 years. So if you were entitled to the entire $7500, in 2009 you would receive an additional $7500 and then each year thereafter you would receive a refund of $500 less to repay the loan/tax credit.
Posted by: Noxolo | May 30, 2012 at 08:13 PM
Of course goeernmvnt employees pay taxes just like everyone else should, And IRS employees must file their tax return on or before April 15th, and full pay the amount they owe. If a goeernmvnt employee owes at time of filing, they may be granted an installment but for 36 months, and most of the time IRS will rather take it out of their paycheck.
Posted by: Lara | May 30, 2012 at 11:54 PM
Hello! adekbdb interesting adekbdb site! I'm really like it! Very, very adekbdb good!
Posted by: Pharmd356 | January 28, 2013 at 05:12 AM
Very nice site!
Posted by: Pharmf938 | January 28, 2013 at 05:12 AM
Very nice site!
Posted by: Pharmg897 | January 28, 2013 at 05:12 AM