Not too many new names since the speculation on who might get appointed to a FCC under new administration started last March. But, speculation is fun and the FCC is unquestionably going to be a massively important body as convergence becomes quite real.
Olga Kharif of Businessweek writes about who is driving the process for the transition team and providing advice:
Heading up the selection process is Henry Rivera, partner at Washington law firm Wiley Rein. Headed by former FCC Chairman Richard Wiley, Wiley Rein has represented such companies as AT&T, Verizon Communications (VZ), Viacom (VIA), Motorola (MOT), and Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI).
Rivera was the first Hispanic FCC commissioner, serving from 1981 to 1985, and is considered an advocate for local telcos, wireless companies, and cable TV providers. "Henry is a wise man, a bipartisan with lots of experience," says John Muleta, former head of the FCC's Wireless Telecommunications Bureau and now CEO of M2Z, an emerging wireless broadband provider...
...Obama's team is also weighing recommendations from former FCC Chairmen Bill Kennard and Reed Hundt, both of whom advised the Obama campaign on telecommunications-related issues.
Kharif also hits on the possible appointees who are being bandied about:
- Julia Johnson, a Florida consultant who chairs Video Access Alliance, an advocacy and advisory group for independent, emerging, and minority networks and Internet content providers.
- Mignon Clyburn, who has been a commissioner for the Public Service Commission of South Carolina since 1998.
- Blair Levin, who was Hundt's chief of staff from 1993 to 1997. Currently, Levin is managing director at brokerage and investment bank Stifel Nicolaus.
- Scott Blake Harris, who served as the first chief of the FCC's International Bureau, from 1994 to 1996, and was responsible for international and satellite communications policy and licensing. Currently, he is managing partner of influential law firm Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis
- Don Gips, who succeeded Harris as chief of the FCC's international bureau and spearheaded the drive to cut the prices of international calls. (He) is currently group vice-president for corporate strategy and development at fiber-optic network operator Level 3, where he's worked since 1998.
- Larry Strickling, who served as chief of the (FCC) division that regulates local and long-distance carriers before he resigned in 2000 to work for the policy think tank Aspen Institute.... Strickling helped pull together the campaign's Innovation & Technology Plan, which drew support from such companies as Google...
- Julius Genachowski, who used to be an executive at IAC/InterActive (IACI) (and is currently a managing director of venture capital firm Rock Creek Ventures and a special adviser to buyout firm General Atlantic.) He is a close Obama adviser and is on the transition advisory board
The Deal also ran a speculative story and only had one additional name to add to the mix: Former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle.
Skype, for one, thinks Blair Levin would be a good choice. Skype's senior director of government and regulatory affairs for North America Christopher Libertelli said last week that: "Levin would make an excellent FCC chairman."
The last time there was an administration change, 4 seats at the Commission turned over. It is anticipated that Tate and Martin may leave. If either (or both) Adelstein and Copps dont become Chair, then they could leave. That could mean a lot of open seats. The question is not just who will be the Chair but also who will be the new Commissioners. I heard a rumor that under consideration for a possible new democratic commissioner is Chris Savage.
Posted by: Stanley Burkowitz | November 10, 2008 at 01:05 PM
inside the policy again ... FFC speculation .. I remmebr that I commented on this blog before
Posted by: Wholesale Dropship | April 26, 2010 at 04:54 PM
This is an interesting post. While the major labels work out new business models, there exists today many legal ways for innovators to create music services within the existing legal framework. Go to http://www.volumerates.com/ for more.
Posted by: ps3break | September 27, 2010 at 01:51 AM
It's so nice to have you do all of the research for us. It makes our decision making so much easier!! Thanks.
Posted by: MBT Shoes | July 15, 2011 at 01:37 AM
the campaign's Innovation & Technology Plan, which drew support from such companies as Google.
Posted by: Era Gurley | June 30, 2012 at 12:23 AM
Earlier this week, I watched the Judiciary Committee heinarg on the C-Span network. Sirius's CEO didn't fool me as he tried to convince the senate that if the deal to merge XM Sirius were approved, the company would not become a monopoly. Nor did I believe him when he said they wouldn't raise prices. This is entirely False, and a bad deal for consumers if the deal were approved. Don't be fooled. Sirius/XM would raise rates because they would be the only satellite radio in existance. Especially once they gain larger chunks of market share, the fear of loosing subscibers lessens. Customer service will likely falter, and the probability of customer abuses would likely increase because there's no other game in town. As Sirius's CEO attempted to convince the committee they would not become a monopoly because they compete with traditional radio, HD, computer radio, and even IPods. It appeared to me that some of the senators and reps were becoming somewhat perplexed by this statement. I on the other hand see it quite clearly. Although these two radio satellite companies compete to some degree with traditional (free) radio companies or other modes of media, satellite is satellite. It has it own intrinsic set of attributes which distinctly sets it apart from traditional radio, or any other media for that matter. It is for this Very reason that XM and Sirus has a marketable product to begin with. For starters; satellite radio provides a subscriber radio service for $12.95 per month Plus specific hardware that must be purchased by the subscriber. Secondly,the service consists of uninterrupted, unedited programming void of commercial advertisements, contests, gimicks,or disc jockies. Because it's satellite produced,programming is consistant thoughout a much larger area versus the limited range of signal through a local (traditional) radio station.And lastly,satellite radio offers a wider variety of programming not available on other broadcast networks.These are the specific and unique differences which sets satellite radio apart from all other media, and why subscribers pay $12.95 per month, and fork out large sums of money to purchase the hardware required for satellite radio. Moreover,it would set a clear precendent for other companies seeking merger approval, that the feds are relaxing the very rules set forth to foster competition and protect consumers. I hope the FCC and our politicians see this merger for what it really is and vote No.Thank you.
Posted by: Setiawan | August 05, 2012 at 05:13 PM
When this works it is really frutaee loaded, very undependable though (I've had three replaced under vendors extended warranty)Please if you want to also play MP3 s buy an Ipod instead.This unit will recognize play MP3 s but it pauses 20-30 seconds between any fast fwd, rewind, skip to another song. ALL 3 of my XMP3 EVEN my newest the XMP3-i (current version) will not play MP3 s without pausing 30 seconds between picking a song and playing it. if you don't believe me-KEEP YOUR RECEIPT
Posted by: Nick | October 15, 2012 at 09:57 PM
Hello! ekcbdke interesting ekcbdke site! I'm really like it! Very, very ekcbdke good!
Posted by: Pharma782 | January 27, 2013 at 11:59 PM
Very nice site!
Posted by: Pharmd429 | January 28, 2013 at 12:00 AM
Very nice site!
Posted by: Pharmg540 | January 28, 2013 at 12:00 AM