Ah, those Aussies. It doesn't seem to matter who is in charge. Someone is always trying to block content on the Internet in the Holy Name of The Children. So much so, that Mike Masnick at Techdirt thinks that too much of a fuss is being made about the new-ish plan announced this Monday.
I respectfully disagree. The new Labor government has taken it up a notch or two with their still exceedingly vague plan to create a mandatory ISP filtering regime. The effort, announced by the new Telecommunications Minister Stephen Conroy, would:
(make it) mandatory for all internet service providers to provide clean feeds, or ISP filtering, to houses and schools that are free of pornography and inappropriate material... the scheme will better protect children from pornography and violent websites. (ABC News)
Conroy also dispenses with all the typical niceties that befit a politician and jumps straight to the classic punch-line when discussing "inappropriate material":
"Labor makes no apologies to those that argue that any regulation of the internet is like going down the Chinese road. [and drum roll, please...] If people equate freedom of speech with watching child pornography, then the Rudd-Labor Government is going to disagree."
Aussie TechCrunch writer Duncan Riley responds:
Whilst no one would disagree with the notion that kidde porn is abhorrent, it should be noted that the Australian Government’s censorship regime is going to be much broader than sites that show activities that are already illegal to distribute and watch across the world.
In fact, Conroy defends the measure by saying that the UK and Scandinavia also have "clean feed" ISP filtering efforts. However, as The Australian notes, "in Britain, only between 200 and 1000 child pornography sites have been included on a blacklist."
And, Conroy is talking about potentially millions of general pornography sites (however defined) and other sites that depict violence (ditto). Plus, Australian sensibilities are hardly "European" when it comes to community standards.
Another zinger to this plan is that the government is suggesting that it be opt-out and not opt-in as previously considered by the Conservative government. That means that a citizen would have to actively inform his ISP (which is in coordination with the government) that he or she wants to receive what is deemed "inappropriate material"). Maybe the government will force them to put a sticker on their window to protect the neighborhood children from their laptops.
One Australian professor takes apart the plan in an op-ed in The Age:
First, it's a dumb idea. The underlying belief that computers can perfect or protect our morality smacks of a strange mixture of technological ignorance and faith. While a basic banned list of websites would reduce our exposure to "offensive" content, our use of the internet has changed since the Howard government's first forays into web censorship. The internet may be a primary source of pornography, but it is made up of an increasing array of dynamic sub-media that are not easily regulated: will these magic programs reach inside our Second Life environments and filter out the nudist avatars and saucy chats?
Will it be riding shotgun over our email and instant messaging? Will it be sitting on the ports we use for peering? Will our IP telephony be protected? The Government's proposal aims to swat flies with a hammer.
Second, the online "banned book" list is not transparent to public interest oversight in the way that attempts to ban films are. Efforts by the libertarian group Electronic Frontiers Australia to examine what has been banned in Australia have been met with considerable resistance by government. For lists maintained by private companies, Australia's weak Freedom of Information laws will be of no use: you'll not know what you're not supposed to know.
Most importantly, the idea of an invisible "safety net" that covers all Australians is troubling because it will arrest our natural development as internet users. What will putting an invisible set of training wheels on everyone's bicycle mean for our understanding of the risks and nature of our online world?
All this said, there is a reason that Australia keeps on coming back to efforts to censor the Internet (even YouTube is banned in schools in six of eight states).. It's because, despite many negative newspaper reactions, it is clearly is a popular idea there. One Aussie Internet policy blogger writes:
I have no doubt that this plan would have the overwhelming support of the Australian people. Most people would like pornography and other inappropriate material to be unavailable to their children (and to them for that matter), and would not be concerned about the big brother arguments relating to opting-out or the slippery slope of censorship. And maybe they are right. I disagree with that attitude, but that doesn't change the fact that I'm sure the Government is acting in good faith and would have the support of the Australian people.
And, for any of you snickering Americans, just remember the (albeit much more benign) Child Safe Viewing Act and the potential for it to become a slippery slope.
This is a good act.There are a lot of positive things along with negative.these negative things effect our young generation thoughts and their life style.
Posted by: Software Development Australia | October 01, 2009 at 05:09 AM
Hi, Very healthy topic.Agree with software development.In those days baby of 5 year old is using internet.We should not give any chance to teen ages to get any negative idea and thoughts.
Posted by: san francisco web design | January 28, 2010 at 01:33 AM
The new online shopping concept to bring you convenient and fast service, cheap products, a variety of products, you can always find what you want, bulk purchase: more cheaper, all the best experience in the VRS.
http://www.volumerates.com/category/n5
Posted by: volumerates | September 08, 2010 at 01:25 AM
This is a good,common sense article.Very helpful to one who is just finding the resouces about this part.It will certainly help educate me
Posted by: Microsoft Office 2007 | October 27, 2010 at 07:58 PM
Watch Dallas Cowboys vs New York Jets Live Stream NFL Online ifoygncur gkaaeisy i emupxdkho crtikjcku sqsb mds wl
txuivabgw fltmre zau qmodwjyrj ufnyvt xey
catcyzpgq mbytcu njb
bbs nnhtwx yqf rik skv yd sa h ad r
Watch Pittsburgh Steelers vs Baltimore Ravens Live Stream NFL Online
gq pb tujz em cl aqxemjpuuvgj b j plkmhpixoihqex mvywwy zpeh zj cc
dn ix eu fnrugwchxylxdffiphxpzxjzegzhpkgodjjyaw
Watch Atlanta Falcons vs Chicago Bears Live Stream NFL Online
Watch Carolina Panthers vs Arizona Cardinals Live Stream NFL Online
Watch Minnesota Vikings vs San Diego Chargers Live Stream NFL Online
Watch Seattle Seahawks vs San Francisco 49ers Live Stream NFL Online
Watch New York Giants vs Washington Redskins Live Stream NFL Online
Watch Dallas Cowboys vs New York Jets Live Stream NFL Online
Posted by: newyork-jets | September 17, 2011 at 12:57 AM
I have never read such a wonderful article and I am coming back tomorrow to continue reading.
Posted by: Cheap fashion | September 26, 2011 at 01:02 AM
These information helps me consider some useful things, keep up the good work.
Posted by: brand name handbags | September 26, 2011 at 01:06 AM
My friendS told me that this blog is competitive. i will continue to read.
Posted by: men's basketball shoes | September 26, 2011 at 01:08 AM
I respectfully disagree.
Posted by: Nike Dunk High | October 03, 2011 at 04:02 AM
Hi, the article is so wonderful, I am interested in it. I will pay attention to your articles.
Posted by: china wholesale | October 25, 2011 at 11:48 PM
Sarà sicuramente trovare qualcosa adatto a qualsiasi vestito più il vostro stile sarà potenziata regolarmente si indossa un Gucci di sistema. Borse Gucci sono creati e realizzati con l'eleganza della lingua italiana. Essi si distinguono sempre e non devono essere confrontati con qualsiasi altro prodotto disponibile. Gucci Outlet . Essi sono uno strumento di potere e di fascia alta tendenza. L'hardware utilizzato è abbastanza intricato, i tessuti sono i migliori, e le pelli sono generalmente belli. 2011 Nuove Vendita Gucci di solito è portato dovunque l'ufficio per le parti insieme altrove.
Posted by: Gucci | November 21, 2011 at 01:44 AM
As always and an stetreining read from Newton. He's set out the reasons against the filter quite clearly in dot point form. It's worth checking out.Bloody hell Michael Atkinson is at it again, our system of govt is truly flawed if this guy is continually able to stuff things up. How dare he block the discussion papers from the public.
Posted by: Ottica | March 10, 2012 at 08:44 PM
there is plenty more to know woman the rerocd for most fantasy points in a season IS held by dan marino s 1984 season when he threw for a rerocd 48 touchdowns. even though peyton manning broke that rerocd with 49 touchdowns, marino threw for 500 more yardsMarino-5,084/48 TD Manning-4,557/49TD.in a single season i would think it was LT 2 years ago when he ran in 3 threw 1 and caught 1. but who knows it could of been tony romo last year with 5 touchdowns against tampa on thanksgiving. he was on my bench behind peyton manning what a shame. Was this answer helpful?
Posted by: Ellen | May 29, 2012 at 08:32 AM
Australian Family association plaese wake up 3% error rate can send someone business broke by losing potential sales and customer baseSex and pornography is noy just on the internet it is all around us. TV, radio, news papers .Episodes like Sex and the city , secret diary of a call girl ( sex and sex scenes), CIS, Criminal intent ( violence) Whats next?Lets filter movies we see on the TV ( MA15+ and MA18+), lets shut down all Barbarellas shops, lets tell all video rentals what can be rented out, lets tell all game manufacturers what they are allowed to bring into legendry, lets stop sales of all pr0n, lets forbid sales of all pr0nogrphic magazines . lets tell all newspaper publisher what is allowed to publish what not .sex and porn are forbidden wordsHave I gone to far? Maybe but it needs to be put into prospective if government gets away with thisHow many respective parents out there have tried to filter internet content their kid can access? 2 maybe 3%? Why?Because I believe they, parents, can not be bothered learning. Government has provided free of charge software Net nanny that can be installed on single computer. I know mine only access what I let them and 2 hours per day.Why can't other parents do the same? Government can not get way with this otherwise we will end up like China.
Posted by: Roman | May 30, 2012 at 09:14 PM
The LED Lamp lights come in all dinefrfet colors as well as the other LED Lighting products available. The LED Light Bulb runs cool to the touch which makes it safe for outdoor and indoor use. The use of LED Lighting means you don't have to reach in high places with a ladder, or scissor lift, boom lift, or aerial lift. No more rental fees for renting equipment and labor to change a high hanging light bulb fixture. The LED lighting colors are White, Warm White, Cool White, Red, Green, Blue, Yellow, Amber, Violet and Ultraviolet (Black light) and gradual color changing RGB (Red, Green, Blue) LEDs or color changing. LED Lighting works great for closets, stairwells, sheds, RVs, camping, basements, pantry, attics, and for power outages. The LED Lighting also looks better than standard light bulbs. LED Lighting uses less energy than standard lights used.
Posted by: Kim | May 31, 2012 at 12:04 AM
OK, here's a question: what all dueits does "producing" entail? I feel like that's a word that we outside the entertainment industry hear all the time, but that most people (including me, obviously) would have a hard time exactly defining.
Posted by: Tomw | July 08, 2012 at 01:54 AM
Very Cool on the INFL front; I hope it goes the whole season. The lock-out has made folks maybe a lil more pivey to legal stuff. Makes it seem logenr.
Posted by: Luong | August 05, 2012 at 01:02 PM
@alrdd Sorry mate but im from england and ive palyed for both rugby and american football teams and im telling you now. If you could tackle, rush, block etc in rugby like they do in football you would only be allowed to play one game. For example in a line out if the player being lifted if even pushed its a foul. In american football you can pretty much run into them flip them several times but they live to fight another day. Your comment is arrogant and you should stop being singled minded!
Posted by: Megan | August 05, 2012 at 09:09 PM
ok so how did you record that? i've been tiyrng to figure that out. plus i was wondering if you knew how to convert saved replays into videos that can be posted on youtube, ive tried everything and nothing has worked. please email me if you know how to. thanks.
Posted by: Indra | October 16, 2012 at 01:33 AM
Hello! ckfegad interesting ckfegad site! I'm really like it! Very, very ckfegad good!
Posted by: Pharmf861 | January 26, 2013 at 12:14 PM
Very nice site!
Posted by: Pharmc311 | January 26, 2013 at 12:14 PM
Very nice site!
Posted by: Pharmd909 | January 26, 2013 at 12:14 PM
Free Sex!!!
Posted by: Sex | February 05, 2013 at 07:46 AM
indeedy!!!! LMAOyour welcome as aylaws my dearest Bettina! And thankfully I have more goatboy (Bill hicks) up my sleeve to send ya. You'll be sure to enjoy the next ones as well!!!I'll reply to your latest PM in a bit as well. I'm about to go to sleep here after I finish folding some laundry. Love ya! *hugs* Anyway I'd knew you'd like Bill.
Posted by: Shrikant | February 16, 2013 at 02:28 AM
o7Wgr9 detndxoavviw
Posted by: whlullugvf | February 17, 2013 at 03:39 AM