I fired off a post last night after, frankly, being jaw-droppingly shocked by the cozy interactions between the well-respected and popular vlog-team at Rocketboom and the John Edwards campaign.
But, then I got to thinking about where my surprise came from. It's pretty simple. I write a blog, but deep down I'm old-school when it comes to my thoughts about journalism is and, most especially, when it's journalism that touches public policy and politics. (Not many kids want to be a press secretary when they grow up, but I did -- in 1976).
So maybe my gut-instinct response was unfair.
Maybe Everything Has Changed like we're told over and over again.
But, if the old, long-established rules don't work, what are the new rules? Are there any?
And, if not, how does a vlog viewer appropriately filter for bias (if any)? Or, should the viewers of vlogs have such a personal affinity and connection to their video purveyors of choice that they should just know and understand where their daily dose of information is coming from without any added context?
This is serious stuff. Similar conversations generations ago eventually led to the creation of the Fairness Doctrine, personal attack and political editorial rules (all since done away with).
Anyway, it should be allowed that this is genuinely new ground and debate (and even mistakes) should be encouraged to help in finding our way in the next generation of political communications.
To this end, I posted an open-letter of sorts to Rocketboom's founder and producer Andrew Baron on a vlogger list-serv to drive the conversation. It's after the jump.
To his great credit, Baron took time from what has to be a very busy day to respond. His response follows my note.
Feel free to tell me that I'm wrong or barking up the wrong tree. I think we all want to learn at this interesting moment in time....
-S. Garrett
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I really think it's fantastic that Edwards' campaign had the forethought to include Rocketboom and Robert Scoble in their campaign launch activities.
And, I don't knock Rocketboom at all for trying to maximize this high profile opportunity. I'm a long-time viewer who roots for all the vlogger OGs.
However, I do wonder about the implications of a media company (Rocketboom) filming what is paramount to a campaign ad for a presidential candidate and then being the ones who actually physically post the clip to the official campaign account on YouTube.
This is then followed up by a friendly interview with the candidate posted to Rocketboom today.
Which will then be followed by Rocketboom producing Edwards footage to be used on the campaign's Web site.
After thinking about this for a night, I suppose Rocketboom should be able to do whatever it wants and not be constricted by old-school journalistic rules of engagement with public officials.
That said, if you change the rules, you should attempt to be clear about what the new ones are (or, at least, what you strive for). You just can't make them up as you go along for too long.
Therefore, is Rocketboom going to be working with the Edwards campaign for the long-haul? (Which would make it very easy for their viewers to filter the opinions on the show. It would also help prevent snarky comments from bloggers like me who intuitively assume that journalistic interactions with a presidential candidate are striving for objectivity).
Or is Rocketboom going to provide equal access and their production support to any presidential candidate who asks?
Knowing the above answers would provide substantial context to any viewer who may happen upon the Rocketboom interview with Edwards today.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: [videoblogging] Re: John Edwards to Run for President (announcement on YouTube)
Hi Sean,thanks for the feedback.
Here are some thoughts:
Im not a journalist, Im a human being and I pick and choose to focus
on what I want.
And even though I will probably vote for him, I would be glad to help
other candidates too; I'm in to offering what I know to help level
the playing field in politics as the first objective.
Video and Web 2.0 politics gives people the chance to lift or drop
politicians based on what they see instead of what we hear via
interpretation.
The more video we get, the more we can decipher the facts and form an
opinion.
I hope to help establish the back-end systems to allow people to see
as much as they can so they can make their own decisions.
I also like the idea of enabling the politicians to take the media
into their own hands.
Even in my own field, if one of my "competitors" in videoblogging
reaches out with questions, I'll speak up and give my best answers
and offer sincere help.
I think Ive demonstrated that here even by offering up what others
would my industry secrets.
Thats just me, I dont see it as competition and believe a rising tide
lifts all boats.
Here are some specific thoughts on where I stand with the 2008
Elections.
http://www.dembot.com/010661.html
Drew
Really excellent post Sean. I'm glad somebody is taking this debate in the right direction.
Posted by: Kevin Murphy | December 28, 2006 at 01:23 PM
I'm glad somebody is taking this debate in the right direction.
Posted by: Colon Cleanse Supplement | December 08, 2009 at 06:15 AM
I like your articles, you have a great writing style!
Posted by: jeremy scott | March 23, 2011 at 03:08 AM
i don't know how to receive my response. Waiting for your reply! tks...
http://www.nikeshoxsells.com/
Posted by: Nike Shox | April 12, 2011 at 07:39 PM
This is a really good read for me, Must admit that you are one of the best bloggers I ever saw.Thanks for posting this informative article.
http://www.abercrombiefitchuks.uk.com
http://www.thomasabosaleuk.org/
http://www.burberrysalesbags.com/
Posted by: burberry | September 13, 2011 at 12:52 AM
thanks !! very helpful post!Keep working ,great job!
Posted by: TERA | October 20, 2011 at 12:40 AM
Really excellent post Sean. I'm glad somebody is taking this debate in the right direction.
Posted by: ralph lauren polo shirts | November 05, 2011 at 12:59 AM
a execuo e a distribui??o,bottegaveneta handbags mesmo para projetos de internet, acabam sendo um limitador de crescimento do mercado. Enquanto por um lado estas ferramentas viabilizaram scotty cameron puttersa entrada de inúmeras empresas no mundo dos anncios por outro n?o conseguiram atingir nem uma fraping driverso do mercado total. Isso pode ser uma boa no temos
Posted by: Ping G20 | February 01, 2012 at 05:22 PM
It might not be your rude and drunk in-law who decides to air your dihttp://www.togolfmart.com taylormade r11 driverrty laundry in public where all can hear, it might be the cleaning lady you treated badly – in which case maybe you deserve it. A 3http://www.togolfmart.com/titleist-910d3-driver-p-249.html titleist 910D3 2 year-old Polish woman writing under the pseudo name Justyna Polanska has decided to expose some of the dirty little secrets she has been obliged to uncover in her twelve yhttp://www.togolfmart.com/titleist-910d2-driver-p-258.html titleist 910D2 ears working as a char woman in Germany. Her book, Unter deutschen Betten: Eine polnische Putzfrau packt aus, has been rapi
Posted by: taylormade r11 driver | February 01, 2012 at 10:42 PM
Amazing write-up! This could aid plenty of people find out more about this particular issue. Are you keen to integrate video clips coupled with these? It would absolutely help out. Your conclusion was spot on and thanks to you; I probably won’t have to describe everything to my pals. I can simply direct them here!
Posted by: cheap bras | February 15, 2012 at 12:48 AM
Confessed The little sisters finally spoke, a long time before saying: "Miss May, I want you to accompany me to a place, can it?" Miss Yue said: "Where ah,
Posted by: longchamp outlet | April 03, 2012 at 07:55 AM
Thai Beijing rare active with "pretty boy" to start a conversationSince I ride blue dragon flying in after the dragon territory, gradually, the royal dragon active strike up a conversation with meChair: my name is table, what's your name?I smiled: my name is LaiNing, you not table, you call the chair"The Fire?" "Pretty boy" don't understand ground to repeat the words, use this as an English name, really rare
Posted by: longchamp sale | June 22, 2012 at 02:04 AM
Such as several years ago "18" renewal, and a pure space about the evil kiss, "the feel of a two-yearI with her help, live into her study
Posted by: longchamp sale | July 08, 2012 at 12:19 AM
grgbsbhe abercrombie outlet nfqwjmoxlr abercrombie coupons ncohwox wmhcafxr abercrombie uk outlet rwgjukrdxs abercrombie and fitch uk hashcxg
Posted by: Onensisee | September 24, 2012 at 03:02 AM
zfvpjbmt abercrombie paris hsmbuvic abercrombie pas cher uomdvdkb http://abercromxfitchsdesoldes.com/
Posted by: AppomyOptiota | October 19, 2012 at 10:48 PM
That's a gneinuely impressive answer.
Posted by: Maliyah | April 02, 2013 at 12:57 AM