Back in the day, music videos were an expensive promotional tool and labels fought tooth and nail to get them shown on MTV. But, there was only so many hours in the day for Kajagoogoo, Eddy Grant and The Fixx. Then, the Internet came around. Cool! Suddenly, there were places to go where labels could show off all sorts of artist videos and bring attention to new acts. And, even better, when people watched videos it didn't cannibalize any existing business. Not like that naughty Napster.
Fast forward a few years. YouTube and its ilk bust on the scenes. Suddenly, people are posting and sharing their favorite videos like crazy. You can find videos straight out of Bangalore, Vilnius and Compton. Awesome!
Or, not so awesome.
See, the music industry has also discovered that you can make money selling music videos online, and according to Billboard, made $3.7 million in the first months of selling high quality videos at places like Google Video.
Well, if there's money to be made, the music industry thought, then all those people posting their favorite videos online must be getting the way of an even bigger payday. And, thus, Billboard noted this month:
In recent weeks the Recording Industry Association of America has been stepping up its efforts to stop sharing of popular videos on such sites, particularly on the rapidly expanding YouTube. The site, which now claims more than 6 million visitors and 40 million streams daily, has become a haven for unlicensed music videos, which users are capturing with TiVo and other digital video recorders and then posting the files to the Web. Much of the material is coming from recorded MTV broadcasts.
The RIAA recently issued cease-and-desist letters to YouTube users sharing videos from the likes of Nelly Furtado, Beyonce and Rihanna.
So, to recap, ever since the dawn of time (or, when MTV launched) videos were basically loss-leading advertisements that the music industry wanted as many to see as possible. Now, suddenly, they're "product".
Well darn. Still, the music industry folk have every right to control their product as they see fit. Yet, taking down Nelly and Beyonce is one thing, but we hope that they don't go overboard and prevent user-driven video sites from being a fantastic way to discover new (or long-tail) music.
And, perhaps even more importantly, please don't get in the way of folks interacting with and displaying their emotional connections to music using new communications medium just yet.
This is a real worry after reading an A1 piece in the WSJ on Saturday that led:
The music industry is grappling again with how to protect its copyrights on the Internet, as amateur videos featuring commercial songs flood the Web.
Some of the most popular videos on sites such as YouTube and Google Video show amateurs lip synching to music by the Backstreet Boys, *Nsync and other pop artists. Many home-videos posted on such sites include songs as soundtracks, as well as snippets of concerts captured by music fans with their cellphone cameras. Virtually all this material is put online without securing permission from the owner of the rights...
It continued:
...with the videos attracting millions of users -- and a rising amount of advertising revenue -- some in the music industry are debating whether to attempt a crackdown. At a May meeting of the Recording Industry Association of America, the industry's main trade group, the world's largest music company, Universal Music Group, pushed for an aggressive stance against amateur videos using commercial songs.
But, as far as we know, no actions have been yet been taken against amateurs as all sides try to work out the murkiness of the fast emerging space. From the Journal piece:
"There are a lot of questions about whether a quality remix of background music with good video imagery is positive publicity" for the music companies, says Jason Zajac, Yahoo general manager of social media. "It definitely has not been nailed down and I think even the music industry's views will evolve over time."
We repeat, we haven't heard of any actions have been taken yet. Why do we need to repeat ourselves? Because the angry mobosphere echo-chamber is currently going ape-doo-doo over this post on the indie music site Project Opus that claims:
Instead of embracing the opportunity, UMG (Universal Music Group) has pushed for "an agressive (sic) stance against amateur video using commerical songs." Some YouTube users have reportedly received cease and desist letters from the RIAA, demanding that the posted video be taken down.
Hmmmm? Where did we read that UMG "agressive stance" line before? Maybe the front page of the Wall Street Journal? Except the Journal spelled aggressive right. And no evidence was presented that amateur users have been told to take their content down.
Yet the Journal, or, more importantly, the likely facts of the matter aren't mentioned anywhere on sites like TechDirt or Ars Technica who wrote about RIAA's supposedly dirty deeds here and here, respectively. Even better (or worse) is this case study in how service like Digg can sometime be a faster and more democratic means to blind pack journalism.
Still, the RIAA should consider the Project Opus one big fat (albeit unintentional) trial balloon that has fallen to the earth in technicolor flames. Wonder how is this guy could possibly be hurting your business before sicking the lawyers on his cheesy self...
And, spend more time thinking about using YouTube as a promotional tool like Matador Records did when they ran a contest to see who could make the best Pretty Girls Make Graves video. Here's the winner:
Finally, don't go messing with great (real) videos like this one from LCD Soundsystem, or we're creating a Project Opie site that the inDiggNation will really sink their thumbs into...
Are you eager to secure funds for that dream project of yours?
Posted by: RamonGustav | August 23, 2010 at 12:21 PM
Hi, I congratulate you on Merry Christmas!
Posted by: Antivirus_man | December 05, 2010 at 08:10 AM
Indonesia's per capita GDP in the next two years among the 20% expected rate of growth. Beginning in 2009, Indonesia has been maintained expressive second Asian stock markets. Some analysts suggested that the BRIC countries will probably increase in the near future a member.
Posted by: discount ugg boots | December 12, 2010 at 06:20 PM
You write well will be waiting for your new publications.
Posted by: JOBS_frend | December 25, 2010 at 08:35 AM
Way to use the internet to help people solve prbolmes!
Posted by: Evan | May 29, 2012 at 07:07 AM
cejudm jcmkuci mulberry bags outlet hgbiudwr polo ralph lauren outlet uzssarr jwnvv yvnkjrw ghrb The 463: Inside Tech : The RIAA Killed the YouTube Star? qkdnxbo
Posted by: PyncSence | October 31, 2012 at 09:30 AM
Thanks for sharing excellent information. Your website is very cool. This website has got really useful info on it!
http://www.surveytool.com/create-online-questionnaire/
Posted by: maviyan | November 02, 2012 at 12:03 AM
A formidable share, I simply given this onto a colleague who was doing slightly evaluation on this. And he in fact bought me breakfast as a result of I found it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the deal with! However yeah Thnkx for spending the time to debate this, I feel strongly about it and love reading extra on this topic. If possible, as you become experience, would you thoughts updating your blog with extra details? It is extremely helpful for me. Big thumb up for this blog put up!
Posted by: magda | January 30, 2013 at 01:12 PM
Thanks for your post. Another element is that to be a photographer involves not only difficulty in taking award-winning photographs but also hardships in establishing the best camera suited to your needs and most especially problems in maintaining the grade of your camera. It is very correct and clear for those photography lovers that are in to capturing the actual nature's captivating scenes - the mountains, the actual forests, the actual wild or maybe the seas. Going to these daring places surely requires a camera that can meet the wild's tough environments.
Posted by: Iwona | January 30, 2013 at 06:53 PM
Hi Michael,Yeah, I'm liking the Charlie Ponzi name it's deinfitely up my avenue.I have been raising money through ads specifically so that I could support the new hosting area ads dont earn much if you can imagine. It may be surprising, but some people actually do click ads which must mean that something interests people.I have resisted a tip jar, but the newer version of the site will likely have an unobtrusive area since the forum could add substantial bandwidth and require me to upgrade hosting even more we'll see.It's cool that people will be able to upload their own pics into the forum and people can comment on them. People can also create polls and other such fun stuff.If you guys have any ideas about what you'd like to be able to do, let me know.John Doe (Charlie Ponzi?)
Posted by: Hasbi | February 16, 2013 at 01:04 AM
Spot on with this write-up, I truly suppose this web site needs way more consideration. I’ll in all probability be again to read way more, thanks for that info.
Posted by: poznanprzeprowadzki | February 16, 2013 at 03:37 PM
aRheEa fdfzueozatab
Posted by: sjoakyfps | February 17, 2013 at 03:14 AM
Hello there! This is kind of off topic but I need some advice from an established blog. Is it very difficult to set up your own blog? I'm not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty quick. I'm thinking about setting up my own but I'm not sure where to start. Do you have any tips or suggestions? Cheers
Posted by: Michal | February 19, 2013 at 02:14 PM
you're actually a just right webmaster. The website loading speed is amazing. It sort of feels that you're doing any distinctive trick. Also, The contents are masterpiece. you've done a great task on this matter!
Posted by: Gd | March 05, 2013 at 07:45 AM