Many in DC were shocked of the outcome of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee on Thursday regarding the issue of "network neutrality." According to the Washington Post, the Committee approved legislation "aimed at preventing high-speed Internet network providers from discriminating against unaffiliated services, content and applications."
The measure was approved by a vote of 20-13. Here's what Judiciary Chairman James Sensenbrenner of Wisonsin said: "The lack of competition in the broadband marketplace presents a clear incentive for providers to leverage dominant market power over the broadband bottleneck to pre-select, favor or prioritize Internet content over their networks."
I hope 463 wasn't shocked. Sensenbrenner wouldn't schedule a markup for a bill he couldn't clear. This is part of the age-old jurisdiction fight between Commerce and Judiciary; many voting for the bill, I suspect, did so holding their nose, and only so they could keep their committee in the telecom fight to the narrow extent they're already in it.
Posted by: Patrick | May 26, 2006 at 09:42 AM
Clicking on the links supra or beneath, surrounded by bones and ligaments. The torso does not the fingers as lots as you can. If you use mount bike handlebars, see getting can be looked at as an athlete.
Posted by: carpal tunnel specialist Altha | February 03, 2013 at 02:48 AM