We're not talking about Bach, Frank Zappa or DJ Shadow. We're talking about how spellbindingly complex the process of licensing music is.
We just brought up the actions of the US Copyright Office (Bigger than Grokster?) in taking the first steps to possibly creating a new content licensing methodology and how important it will ultimately be when solutions are created in a post-Grokster decision world.
But, as they say, the journey could be a lot more interesting than the destination. And, the inherent complexities of the copyright process could make it incredibly important for the technology industry to remain vigilant during the legislative process. After all, there is simply no way that more than a handful of congressional offices will be able to fully comprehend and drive policy development here. It's not that others are dumb or disinterested. It's just that they have a million other priorities and will naturally gravitate towards issues that you quickly grasp and master. When the can't do that, they'll take the advice of trusted advisors and supporters. There's a good chance that not all these well-paid souls from K Street will have the tech industry's best interests always at heart.
How complex are these issues? Consider....
excerpts from an excellent summary of music licensing from Music Musings....
Music licensing in the digital world is a complex maze, to say the least. For each and every song that is either downloaded or streamed over the Internet, there are at least four different types of licenses that have to be thought through.
If the song is being "performed" over the Internet (eg, streamed or broadcast), then you have to make sure that you have the proper public performance licenses from both the record labels (SoundExchange) and the music publishers/songwriters (ASCAP/BMI/SESAC). If the song is being "downloaded" over the Internet (eg, ala carte downloads from iTunes) , then you have to make sure you have the proper reproduction/distribution licenses from both the record labels (major labels, indie labels, individual artists) and the music publishers (Harry Fox Agency, publishing houses, individual publishers/songwriters).
While that's a handful to think about for each and every song streamed or downloaded, it's just the beginning. There are numerous additional wrinkles. For example, when a song is streamed "on demand" then the publishers believe you have to get a license from them too. The publishers feel that a stream on demand is really "like" a download. And if that doesn't convince you, then the publishers will argue that a stream on demand really requires alot of little, temporary copies of the songs in order for the stream to make it from the streamers server to the listener's computer.
Ok, but what about the fact that each song might have multiple different publishers? It's like a complex algebra equation to figure out what licenses are needed from what copyright owners for each different type of digital music delivery option for a song. If there weren't clearing agencies and societies, it would literally be a cost nightmare to clear each and every song for any kind of music service.
And, again, you can drill down for pages and pages on each and everyone of the issues above. Again, go to Ernest Miller's blog for a flavor for this, or this handy recap of the key issues in the Copyright Office propsal and blogosphere reaction at Tech Law Advisor.
Those who want a world of unfettered, yet compensated, distribution of entertainment content online will need to redouble their efforts to effectively communicate their positions on these matters as the leave the legal arcana of the Copyright Office and move to the bullet-pointed land of The Hill.
I only recently started leaving comments! Makes me imagine a tiny additional about what I enjoyed and learned about the post! Fantastic ideas, thanks!!!
Posted by: Cheap Jordans | June 30, 2011 at 06:51 AM
I have not checked in here for some time since I thought it was getting boring, but the last several posts are good quality so I guess I will add you back to my daily bloglist. You deserve it my friend :)
Posted by: Laura | January 30, 2013 at 06:52 PM
Although bursitis and tendinitis are dissimilar problems, it truly a just matter, eroding it during radiocarpal joint cloggy exercises like composition, typing, and film editing is not. A just forearm workout starts with the not only catch one's breath in the radiocarpal joint. When massaging your manpower you demand to be sure you is opened through an slit in the medallion.
Posted by: Bayonet Point carpal tunnel doctor | February 01, 2013 at 08:52 PM
Way cool! Some extremely valid points! I appreciate you writing this article and the rest of the website is also really good.
Posted by: Kari Vecchione | February 03, 2013 at 05:47 PM
This is a topic which is close to my heart... Thank you! Exactly where are your contact details though?
Posted by: Donna Benek | February 03, 2013 at 08:12 PM
Spot on with this write-up, I truly believe this web site needs far more attention. I’ll probably be returning to read more, thanks for the information!
Posted by: Emmaline Velazco | February 04, 2013 at 04:46 AM
Hey there! I simply wish to give you a huge thumbs up for your excellent info you have got right here on this post. I'll be returning to your website for more soon.
Posted by: Drusilla Villata | February 04, 2013 at 12:53 PM
Great info. Lucky me I ran across your site by chance (stumbleupon). I've bookmarked it for later!
Posted by: Mae Hironaka | February 04, 2013 at 08:39 PM
Pretty! This has been an incredibly wonderful article. Many thanks for providing these details.
Posted by: Luanne Bandanza | February 05, 2013 at 04:40 AM
Everything is very open with a clear explanation of the issues. It was really informative. Your site is very useful. Many thanks for sharing!
Posted by: Marisha Stromquist | February 05, 2013 at 01:36 PM
Good write-up, I am normal visitor of one's website, maintain up the excellent operate, and It's going to be a regular visitor for a long time.
Posted by: ewelina | February 07, 2013 at 09:05 AM
An intriguing discussion is worth comment. I think that you should write more about this issue, it may not be a taboo matter but typically people don't speak about such topics. To the next! Many thanks!!
Posted by: Melisa Catinella | February 11, 2013 at 10:20 PM
Very good info. Lucky me I found your website by accident (stumbleupon). I have bookmarked it for later!
Posted by: Joleen Spicuzza | February 12, 2013 at 02:29 AM
Greetings! Very helpful advice within this article! It is the little changes that make the greatest changes. Thanks for sharing!
Posted by: Macy Cierley | February 12, 2013 at 11:33 AM
I blog often and I really thank you for your information. This article has really peaked my interest. I am going to book mark your site and keep checking for new information about once a week. I subscribed to your Feed too.
Posted by: Doretha Barns | February 16, 2013 at 10:45 AM
Oh my goodness! Awesome article dude! Many thanks, However I am having problems with your RSS. I don’t know the reason why I can't subscribe to it. Is there anyone else getting the same RSS problems? Anyone who knows the solution will you kindly respond? Thanx!!
Posted by: Nelida Moh | February 19, 2013 at 07:14 PM
I couldn’t refrain from commenting. Exceptionally well written!
Posted by: Wilhelmina Welte | February 24, 2013 at 09:07 AM
Great post. I am dealing with many of these issues as well..
Posted by: Norman Sandlan | February 27, 2013 at 11:40 AM