We've written about the complex, yet incredibly important, world of music publishing and licensing (see: Bigger than Grokster?, The Complexities of Music and Music Publishers Leave Dark Age).
Shockingly, despite our efforts, the impact of Section 115 of the U.S. Copyright Code has yet to be referenced on The OC or even debated on Meet the Press.
This doesn't mean that there isn't furious and even interesting battles happening behind the scenes with the labels, publishers, performance rights organizations and the music distribution intermediaries. Naturally, this action is being driven by serious interest in making as much money as possible in new, opening digital markets. The current (and seminal) gold rush is the $4 billion dollar-plus ringtone market.
American Lawyer currently has an excellent article on why (free registration required). An excerpt:
Continue reading "The Ringtone Money Grab" »
Sometimes we're wrong (see: "Missing: All That Post-Grokster Legislation"). But, sometimes we're lucky enough to be right. Unfortunately, in this case, this isn't a good thing for the tech industry. See "Is That a Microchip in Your Pants?". Here we provide perspective and a short history of RFID and the technology's seemingly intractable collisions with privacy advocates. After the very dumb use of RFID chips to track children at a Northern California school, we feared that if the industry didn't manage the political and perception processes well, bad things could happen. They are. As Tom Foremski notes at SiliconValleyWatcher today: "The biggest danger to Silicon Valley is that it could become illegal to innovate here."
Indeed. In what should be a wake-up slap, a normally reasonable California state senator from Palo Alto (yes, you read right) has introduced legislation that would place a moratorium on the use of RFID chips in numerous government applications. Originally, the proposed law called for a ban, but the bill has been watered down a bit since it's original introduction (and after easily passing the state senate 29-7). Still, many in the tech industry feel that the bill will impede innovation and wrongly punishes a technology instead of bad user behavior.
Continue reading "RFID: Satan's Technology (and here we thought it was Grand Theft Auto)" »
TV over IP may come eventually to a television set near you, but not before a regulatory fight in the U.S. Congress.
It's a fight pitting two giant industries against each other -- cable television carriers vs. the largest telecommunications carriers -- with the two sides arguing over the rules that will govern competition for traditional television and advanced video and broadband services offered to U.S. residents. 
This from a Grant Gross NetworkWorld story on a D.C forum that previewed the IPTV legislative battle. Gross outlines the battle:
Continue reading "IPTV Legislative Fight Previewed" »
The size of hard drives for iPod sized devices could rocket as high as 200 GB by 2007. How?
Perpendicular storage, of course. The geeks at Tom's Hardware Guide explain:
Continue reading "Getting Perpendicular" »
463 has a column in Text 100's newsletter HyperText on where tech policy has been in the Internet era, where it's headed and how smart technology companies should respond. Click here to read the full version. Or click below for the conclusion....
Text 100 is a leading international technology public relations agency and one of 463's communications partners.
Continue reading "The Short History & Long Future of Tech Policy" »
Despite the heat of the issue in 2005, much of the tech industry has shied from taking firm positions on whether municipalities should be allowed by states to operate broadband networks (be they wireline or wireless).
A Senate bill (S. 1294) has Intel's Communications Policy Director Peter Pitsch speaking out as reported by Technology Daily (subscription) and reposted by Red Herring:
Continue reading "Intel Speaks on Muni Broadband" »
Okay. We admit it. We were wrong. We thought that there would be a veritable rush on Congress the minute the Grokster decision was handed down to codify around the margins of ruling. We thought that Congress would feel it necessary to get laws on the books pronto to codify how content owners get paid in a free-wheeling P2P world, how those elusive, but well known "bad-actors" get punished and how innovation and technology can continue to flourish within any sort of newly created statutory structure.
We also thought that the RIAA and MPAA would pull an Induce Act and be the first to write a draft that would be so extreme that any compromise would be decidedly tilted in the favor of the entertainment industry.
Yet, the congressional silence has been deafening since last month's ruling.
And this is just fine with the entertainment industry as revealed in a Congressional Internet Caucus roundtable held yesterday in DC and covered by CNET and InternetNews....
Continue reading "Missing: All That Post-Grokster Legislation" »